Poor doxed Louise... after 3 husbands, 20 facelifts, and 2 str8 days if getting CyberBullied by hackers she STILL is DEFENSELESS and rage spamming her feed with autism all over twitter to her fake botted followers. A mother and failed politician ranting on and on about Russian spy's, Covid, politics, etc. She genuinely believes that her twitter rants do something to harm the RUssian economy or make the world a better place. This lady underwent crminal charges for stealing her former husbands Tax returns. (Court records below) She now resides in a 1 bedroom studio apartment with nothing to show for her pathetic attempt of a life, sitting on her AT&T account which is still payed for by her husband Peter Mensch who she got indicted for TRYING to steal from. Louise is a complete failure below you will find proof of her ineptitude, her Social Security number, emails, addresses, articles of her political career which fell apart, and more. Please do enjoy the document and remember that "The House Always Wins." Making up russian names and posting fake info on twitter on BWA members will do nothing. You're not built for the infosec career which you roleplay that you are good at Louise. Your political career is a FRAUD. Your hacking career is a FRAUD. Your pretending to "dox" people like IRDev looks cringe as fuck. You think he is indian when his lawsuit against the CIA is public. How dumb can you possibly be lady? LOL Like GET REAL!!! Anyways to all who are reading enjoy the release. Proof of facelift be4 & after picks and BWA laughing at this reject; https://gyazo.com/d568bac3a35d1d638ce8c9588225b06d Her fake doxing others earlier in May: https://archive.is/drobG Deluded cumdump thinks she "doxxed" us LMAO https://gyazo.com/e6301ce3262f7e7f3f70d0c9b93ab9ee https://gyazo.com/d28447ef1e9146503aae58345f772a3b Time 2 bring her back 2 reality a little bit with a couple L'z from the UnDoXeD Department @Patribotics another follower of louise Mensch (Some ex parliament washed up author) Who got her husband doxed and SPIT ON by BWA Is now raging all over twitter and Fake Doxing people Screenshots of the failure getting humiliated are below enjoy =`}~~ #LeninGradOnTop https://gyazo.com/2e69795074263396e16f2f43dc76b6d7 https://gyazo.com/a63f110ccb23bf51abeba0c766d0d952 Retard pretend doxes Sa7an: https://gyazo.com/17915c8c573f2a3961b677f3fde0e493 https://gyazo.com/17915c8c573f2a3961b677f3fde0e493 This British poser just took the Biggest L on social media this MONTH LMFAO ========================================================================================= Twitter handles: @Patribotics @Dear_Mr_Putin @LouiseMesch @Dear_Mr_Putin @Patribotics @LouiseMnesch Louise Mensch (Louise D Bagshawe) DOB: 06/28/1971 SSN: 616-08-5961 IRL: https://gyazo.com/3c355d2aefaf9e540bb5317f0be2e645 // https://gyazo.com/a6dd250ec3cc0bfdfefea501ff9d1f9a 41 Bradhurst Ave New York, NY 10030 - Current Phone Numbers (917) 821-1757 - Wireless (914) 961-3563 - Landline (212) 580-6597 - Landline louisemensch@gmail.com Bank info from chex-systm api "dateOfBirth":"1971**","genderCode":"F","maritalstatus":null,"socialSecurityNumber":null,"firstName":"LOUISE","lastName":"MENSCH","driversLicenseNumber":null,"state":null,"areaCode":"212","phoneNumber":"5806597" Other related / Old (Possibly on same phone plan) (212) 929-6525 - Landline (917) 623-2221 - Wireless (212) 724-1986 - Landline (914) 793-2092 - Landline 917 821 1757 (Old still works) Wiki Leaks Fwd: Hillary ad From:mkives@caa.com To: ha16@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, re47@hillaryclinton.com Date: 2016-02-14 16:29 Subject: Fwd: Hillary ad I like this idea (Louise is a former Conservative British MP. Very smart.) Begin forwarded message: From: Louise Mensch > Date: February 14, 2016 at 11:25:16 AM MST To: Michael Kives > Cc: Peter Mensch > Subject: Hillary ad Dear Michael, As you will know from Arnold I am a committed Republican (or would be if I had the vote this year). But I worry no end about Donald Trump becoming our President... much rather have your girl Hillary. Anyway, the politician in me thinks Lena Dunham and Gloria Steinem are nails on a chalkboard to the average American woman AND I think Hillary is not capitalizing on the yearning that we have to see a woman as President properly. Her competence and intelligence are beyond doubt, her problem is warmth. If I may, here is an ad I would love to see run; OUR TIME A succession of mostly young women, a few old women, one with a baby daughter, multiracial and multi-occupation, to include a nurse and a woman in uniform of some kind where permitted... one after the other, smiling and looking to camera and saying 'It's our time.' and the last woman says, 'It's our time. I'm with her.' fade to banner credit 'Hillary 2016' ---- That would be inspirational, aspirational, and the kind of riff you really need on 'Yes we can'. Best, Louise -- Louise Mensch +1 917 821 1757 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. She made her name as a bestselling writer, before becoming a Conservative MP last year, so how is Louise Bagshawe adjusting to her new life? Louise Bagshawe is a single mum. She is a novelist who has sold about two million books. She also represents more than 90,000 people as a Member of Parliament. In one of those career-defining statements which can sometimes come back to haunt people, Ms Bagshawe once said: "Of course women can have it all, if they want it all. I won't hear any defeatist talk." There would hardly be any time for it, even if she wanted to complain. Snacking on a muffin in the atrium of Portcullis House, where Westminster politicians go to gossip and socialise, she seems driven by adrenalin, having been elected the Conservative MP for Corby, in Northamptonshire, at last year's general election. "It's unbelievably hectic," she said. "Having previously been a writer, where my office was my bedroom, it's very different. It's been a long time since I had a real job, and that was working in the record business for five minutes. >>> AFFAIR <<< A British politician has been accused of having a 20-year extramarital affair with an American rock band manager who she went on to marry. The family of Melissa Meyer have accused ex-Conservative MP Louise Mensch - née Bagshawe - of having an illicit relationship with Peter Mensch while he was still married to American Melissa. Ms Meyer's family have voiced suspicions that the couple had a 20-year affair when they were both married – Peter to Melissa, and Louise to U.S. businessman Anthony LoCicero. The two women now live in close proximity in Manhattan after Louise, 41, dramatically announced she was resigning her parliamentary seat in England and moved into a mansion on the Upper West Side with Peter. Melissa, a 44-year-old former school teacher, remains in the $7million Greenwich Village townhouse she once shared with her husband. The likelihood of the two women peacefully coexisting seems especially remote after the startling claim by the family of Melissa, known as Missy, that Peter and Louise were long embroiled in an adulterous affair. Pic: https://gyazo.com/314d20cb0cde8324bc8befc7b17c9261 ============= Work related job desc & info pulled off work registries: Webcam Consumer Interviews Title Webcam Consumer Interviews CITRIN COOPERMAN OXONIAN SOCIETY, INC. THE OXONIAN SOCIETY ST. MARTIN'S PRESS ZEMANTA APOLLO_IO_129M_MARKETING_2018 Email lmensch@newscorp.com Name Louise Mensch City New York Country United States Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/louisemensch Job Creative & Strategic Company Newscorp Phone +12124163400 City New York Country United States Postal 10036 Job Vice President, Creative and Strategy, News Corporation Company The News Corporation Limited Phone +12128527000 City New York Country United States Postal 10036 Job Vice President, Creative and Strategy, News Corporation Company News Corp DRIZLY_COM_2M_SHOPPING_072020 Not Found Email bagshawe@me.com Lastip 107.77.224.132 Brooklyn, New York, United States Hash $2a$10$dorJ8ntJtIMXafb240vIpeNLfzwPravKgYL8baqVEG8jP7Lf1Jp4y Salt $2a$10$dorJ8ntJtIMXafb240vIpe Password c0904fcad0cf24d38bc65156d5b49ca3 Name Louise Mensch 123RF_COM_8M_PHOTOS_032020 Not Found Email louisemensch@GMAIL.COM Lastip 216.220.98.51 Hash dc7f4178ed8db0a66441433fa05d65df Name Louise Mensch Phone 9178211757 Company Forma Flos Inc Street1 116 West 80 City New York State NY Country GB Postcode 10024 Newsletter N Payby paypal Paypal_email louisemensch@gmail.com Paymentlimit 50.00 Approved Y Date_register 2016-09-16T22:00:00.000Z Agreement Y Allowextended Y Mini_lb 1 Ip_country US DRIZLY_COM_2M_SHOPPING_072020 Not Found Email louisemensch@gmail.com Lastip 98.15.86.224 New York, New York, United States Hash $2a$10$lilfL7MDtpBBgGDuZG2VpeGZtAidwigFVihqVf6vgn2ilPaurvxym Salt $2a$10$lilfL7MDtpBBgGDuZG2Vpe Name Louise Mensch ============= Below is rthe court documents on when our mentally inatiquate friend (@Patribotics) aka Louise Mensch ATTEMPED TO STEAL her former husbands tax refund check for $800,000. Being the failure that she is she got caught and subpoenaed to court. The court records are here below. Enjoy the hilarity. Court records when she stole Peters Tax Refund SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------x PETER MENSCH, S U M M O N S Plaintiff, Index No.: -againstPLACE OF TRIAL LOUISE MENSCH, New York County BASIS OF VENUE: Defendants. Plaintiff’s Residence -------------------------------------------------------x To the Above Named Defendant: YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Verified Complaint in this action and to serve a copy of your answer, on the plaintiff’s attorneys within 20 days after the service of this summons, exclusive of the day of service (or within 30 days after the service is complete if this summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the complaint. Dated: September 11, 2020 ADVOCATE, LLP By: Eleanor Grosz, Esq. 805 Third Avenue, Suite 2030 New York, New York 10022 (212) 776-1926 Attorneys for Plaintiff To: David Zaslavsky, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant 11 Broadway, Suite 450 New York, New York 10004 (212) 390-0076 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 1 of 15 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY --------------------------------------------------------x PETER MENSCH, Index No. Plaintiff, VERIFIED COMPLAINT -againstLOUISE MENSCH, Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------x Plaintiff Peter Mensch, by his attorneys, Advocate, LLP, as and for his Complaint against Defendant Louise Mensch, alleges the following: Nature of this Action 1. This is an action to reform the Stipulation of Settlement dated July 19, 2019, and Judgment of Divorce entered on August 28, 2019, between the Parties. In that Stipulation, Plaintiff agreed to pay and Defendant agreed to accept a total of $3.8 million in full and final satisfaction of all her claims for equitable distribution, and Defendant waived any and all interest in all other property including Plaintiff’s income tax overpayments and refunds. However, when Plaintiff filed his 2018 US and New York State income tax returns, after the Parties had entered into that Stipulation, the New York State Tax Authority declined to allow him to receive the full credit for the 2017 income tax overpayment that was due on his income as shown on his 2017 return, and instead allocated half of that refund to Defendant. Although she was not and is not entitled to receive or retain that refund, Defendant has opportunistically asserted that the refund is hers and that she is entitled to hold it in addition to the $3.8 million Plaintiff agreed to pay. Because that was decidedly not the agreement the Parties – and their lawyers – made, Plaintiff seeks a declaration enforcing the Stipulation or, alternatively, reformation on the grounds of FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 2 of 15 2 mutual mistake, a scrivener’s error: their lawyers inadvertently neglected to include in the Stipulation a helpful but not required standard boilerplate provision that Defendant had no interest in and was not entitled to any portion of the income tax overpayment they knew would be due to Plaintiff as the result of his historic overpayment of estimated taxes. Based on the 2017 income tax return they filed jointly (their last joint return), Plaintiff’s overpayment was in excess of $800,000, and his overpayment on the New York State Return was more than $250,000 – half of which Defendant has wrongfully, improperly and unjustly applied (of will seek to have applied) to her own benefit, despite the Parties’ knowledge and agreement and the provisions of the Stipulation. Parties 2. Plaintiff resides in the City and State of New York. 3. Defendant resides in the City and State of New York. Background Facts 4. The Parties were married in 2011. 5. Plaintiff commenced an action for divorce in Supreme Court, New York County: Mensch v. Mensch, Index No. 309381/2017 in September 2017. 6. On July 19, 2019, the Parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (“Stipulation”), and a Judgment of Divorce, which incorporated but did not merge the Stipulation, was entered on August 28, 2019 (A copy of the Stipulation is annexed as Exhibit A.) 7. The Parties were represented by experienced counsel in the divorce action and in connection with the Stipulation. Plaintiff was represented by Eleanor Grosz, Esq., and Defendant was represented by Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich, LLP. 8. In the Stipulation, Plaintiff agreed to pay, and Defendant agreed to accept a Tax Free Distributive Award of $3.8 million. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 3 of 15 3 9. As the result of (i) the New York State Tax Authority’s error in failing to allocate the full 2017 New York State overpayment to Plaintiff’s 2018 income tax obligation, (ii) Defendant’s effort to take advantage of that error knowing full well that her financial rights were limited to a $ 3.8 million settlement; and (iii) the inadvertent failure by counsel for both parties to include in the Stipulation, what would have been a helpful but not required, boilerplate provision in the Stipulation making it clear that Defendant had no right to receive the benefit of any tax overpayments; the Stipulation should be enforced so as to limit the financial benefit to Defendant to the $ 3.8 million she bargained for or, in the alternative, to reform the Stipulation to specifically address that each party is entitled to the overpayment, if any, solely attributable to his or her income. Plaintiff’s Historic Practice of Overpaying his Estimated Taxes 10. Plaintiff’s business is to manage musicians and other artists. He earns a significant income, which can vary substantially from year to year. 11. Historically, Plaintiff has followed his accountant’s advice and routinely, overpays his estimated taxes with the consequence that he invariably is entitled to a substantial tax refund or credit to his following year’s obligation. Also consistent with his accountant’s advice, Plaintiff elects to apply his overpayments against the estimated taxes due on his following year’s income tax return. 12. Plaintiff employed this practice on both his Federal and New York State tax returns. 13. Plaintiff did the same with respect to the 2017 tax year, the year in which he filed the divorce action. 14. Defendant was not employed in 2017 and had modest income that year. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 4 of 15 4 15. Defendant was at all times aware that Plaintiff intentionally overpaid his estimated taxes, and she acknowledged and agreed that he – and not she – would not be entitled to any portion of that overpayment. 16. The Parties filed joint returns for 2017, the year the divorce action was commenced. 17. Plaintiff filed his income tax returns for 2018 after the Stipulation was signed in July 2019, and the Judgment of Divorce was entered in August 2019. 18. Upon information and belief, as of the date of this complaint, Defendant has not yet filed her 2018 income tax returns. 19. Although the Stipulation addressed the Parties’ respective obligations to pay his her income taxes, interest and penalties as related to each of his/her own income and the Parties’ respective obligations for deficiency assessments, penalties and interest flowing from his her income, the Stipulation did not specifically include language providing that each of the Parties would be given credit for their respective overpayments, if any, resulting from his/her income. 20. The omission of this language was an inadvertent mistake: it was a scrivener’s error, and it fails to capture the agreement of the Parties. 21. The Stipulation incontrovertibly provides that Defendant was entitled to, and would be paid $3.8 million in equitable distribution – no more, and no less. The Stipulation 22. In exchange for, among other things, waiving claims to any appreciation in the value of Plaintiff’s various separate and marital property, Plaintiff agreed to pay Defendant $3.8 million as a tax free distributive award (“Tax Free Distributive Payments”). 23. The Tax Free Distributive Payments were to be made as follows: a. $1,000,000 on July 19, 2019 (upon signing the Stipulation); FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 5 of 15 5 b. $1,800,000 on or about August 2, 2019 (when Defendant vacated their former marital residence); c. $400,000 of the remaining $1 million on or before July 1, 2020 (the “First Anniversary Payment” in the Stipulation); d. $300,000 on the second anniversary of Defendant’s vacating the former marital residence (“Second Anniversary Payment”); and the final e. $300,000 on the third anniversary of Defendant vacating our former marital residence (“Third Anniversary Payment”). 24. In Paragraph 3.10 of the Stipulation, Defendant expressly waived any further equitable distribution in excess of, or other than, the Tax Free Distributive Payments. Specifically, the Stipulation provides: Except as specifically set forth in this Agreement, the parties waive any further division or distribution of marital or separate property .... It is the parties’ intent that this provision shall, in conjunction with the remaining provisions of this Agreement, be determinative, definitive and in final disposition and in satisfaction of any and all ownership claims or equitable or legal rights that either may have in and to any property, separate or marital, of the other. [Emphasis added.] 25. Similarly, Paragraph 13.5 of the Stipulation provides that: This Agreement is entire and complete and embodies all of the understandings and agreements of the parties and supersedes any and all prior understandings and agreements between them. [Emphasis added.] 26. Article IX of the Stipulation addressed the Parties’ income taxes. The Parties’ acknowledged that they filed joint income tax returns through year 2017. The Parties’ each represented that they were unaware of any outstanding or unpaid taxes, penalties or interest relating to their joint returns. (Stipulation, ¶9.1, p. 30). 27. But, unfortunately and mistakenly, the Stipulation did not expressly state – what the Parties had nevertheless agreed – that Defendant was not and would not be entitled to any FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 6 of 15 6 other financial benefit including overpayments or refunds attributable to his income or related to any of their joint returns. 28. Defendant agreed to this because, among other things, the annual income and earnings of the Parties was vastly disproportionate and substantially all (if not all) of the estimated tax overpayment was attributable to Plaintiff and his historic practice of overpaying his estimated taxes. 29. In addition, Plaintiff agreed to pay and to indemnify Defendant from and against any deficiency assessments, including penalties and interest for any joint returns they had filed to the extent that it was a result of (a) his failure to disclose income that should have been included in the joint return, (b) disallowance of deductions attributable solely to his income, and (c) any business in which he was/is the majority owner. 30. Similarly, Defendant provided Plaintiff with a reciprocal indemnity and hold harmless. 31. The Parties also expressly agreed that they would file separate income tax returns “for the year 2018 and each successive year.” (Stipulation, ¶9.1, p. 30) The 2017 Income Tax Returns 32. On or about April 11, 2018, the Parties each signed IRS Form 8878 authorizing their then-accountants, Citrin Cooperman, to file for an extension of time to file their 2017 tax returns. 33. On or about October 12, 2018, the Parties each authorized Citrin Cooperman to electronically file their 2017 joint returns, which contained the overpayments at issues, and which returns were in fact filed that month. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 7 of 15 7 34. Citrin Cooperman determined that Plaintiff had overpaid his 2017 federal income taxes by $816,102 and Defendant had underpaid her federal income taxes by $10,413. 35. The Parties, thus, had an overpayment of $805,689 on their 2017 Federal tax return – 100% of which was attributable to Plaintiff’s earnings. 36. In filing his 2018 federal income tax return Plaintiff duly elected to apply his entire federal overpayment to his 2018 federal income tax obligation. 37. Similarly, the 2017 NYS return showed an overpaid the taxes due to New York State for 2017 by the amount of $255,480. 38. Citrin Cooperman specifically determined that for 2017, Plaintiff had over paid his State taxes by $246,478 and Defendant had over paid her state by $9,002. 39. As he had done with respect to his Federal taxes, Plaintiff elected to apply the entire overpayment of $255,480 to his 2018 New York State income tax obligation. 40. Defendant was at all times aware of these determinations by Citrin Cooperman and of the notices and elections made by Plaintiff for tax year 2017. 41. Plaintiff’s practice – overpaying his estimated taxes, applying the overpayment to future tax liabilities and not taking a cash refund from the taxing authority (State or Federal) – was long-standing and well known to Defendant. 42. Citrin Cooperman, the Parties’ accountants, were his accountants before the Parties married and they have been his accountants for decades. Citrin Cooperman has consistently taken this conservative approach to preparing Plaintiff’s – and the Parties’ – tax returns in order to ensure that Plaintiff (and the Parties during the marriage) did not incur any penalties, particularly since Plaintiff received income from several companies, for which Schedule K-1s frequently were not issued until well after April 15. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 8 of 15 8 43. For example, in 2016, Plaintiff had an overpayment of $1,151,977 to the IRS, which he applied to his 2017 taxes. Plaintiff applied his overpayment of $410,067 on his State taxes towards his 2017 State tax obligation. 44. Following changes in the tax law at the end of 2017, Citrin Cooperman advised Plaintiff to take an even more conservative approach regarding payment of estimated taxes in 2017. 45. On April 15, 2018, when Plaintiff filed for an extension to file his 2017 returns, he paid an additional $350,000 in estimated taxes to the IRS and over $400,000 to New York State – even though he already had an overpayment of more than $1.1 million that was being applied from the 2016 return towards his 2017 estimated taxes. Defendant is not Entitled to Claim Plaintiff’s 2017 Overpayments on her 2018 Returns 46. Defendant was at all times fully aware of Plaintiff’s 2017 income (which exceeded his 2016 income) and his significant overpayment of taxes due for 2017. 47. During the negotiations that led to the Stipulation, Plaintiff’s 2017 income was fully disclosed, as was his practice of overpaying his estimated taxes and applying the overpayment to future tax liabilities. 48. The Parties had contemplated filing a joint return for 2017, but they ultimately filed separate tax returns for 2017 when Defendant refused to provide documentation Plaintiff and his accountants with information regarding her income, expenses, and deductions to the accountants. 49. Plaintiff filed his 2017 tax returns under the status: “married filing separately.” 50. Plaintiff applied the federal overpayment of $805,689 towards his 2018 federal tax liability, and he applied the $255,480 overpayment towards his 2018 State tax liability. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 9 of 15 9 51. Plaintiff’s tax filings were proper and consistent with the Parties’ agreement as was (or should have been) provided in the Stipulation. 52. After he filed his tax returns for 2017, he received notices from the IRS and New York State. 53. The IRS accepted his return and applied the entire $805,689 overpayment towards his 2018 tax obligations. 54. New York State, however, advised Plaintiff, without any foundation in fact or law, that it would only allow Plaintiff a credit of $127,740 (only 50% of the $255,480 overpayment) towards his 2018 NYS tax obligation. 55. Upon information and belief, this means that New York is applying or intends to apply the other half of Plaintiff’s overpayment ($127,740) as a credit on Defendant’s 2018 tax returns. 56. Upon information and belief, because Defendant over paid her New York State income taxes by only $9,002 in 2017, by claiming or taking credit for the $127,740 that Plaintiff had overpaid his anticipated tax liability, Defendant will receive a windfall refund or credit on her New York State tax return of more than $120,000. 57. Because Defendant had under paid her 2017 Federal income taxes by more than $10,000, the entire $828,605 overpayment on the Parties’ 2017 (their last) joint Federal tax return was entirely attributable to – and was allowed by the IRS – to Plaintiff. 58. Upon information and belief, however, if Defendant were to file and seek to claim 50% of Plaintiff’s Federal overpayment, or if she were to challenge the IRS’s determination that Plaintiff is entitled to the entire overpayment, Defendant would seek, and she might receive, another windfall credit or refund of potentially $400,000 or more. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 10 of 15 10 59. When Plaintiff learned that New York State would not apply all of the 2017 overpayment to his tax obligations and his 2018 tax return, he contacted Defendant in an effort to correct the mistake and make an appropriate adjustment consistent with their agreement. 60. Plaintiff offered to Pay Defendant $9,002 (the amount of her own 2017 overpayment), and to waive any claim for reimbursement of the $10,413 by which she had underpaid her 2017 Federal taxes; and he asked Defendant to file her 2018 income tax returns consistent with the agreement reached as to the division of marital and separate assets and liabilities, i.e., an agreement not to file any tax returns claiming any portion of the 2017 overpayment on her 2018 tax returns. 61. In exchange, Plaintiff proposed that Defendant could retain the anticipated refund from New York State (approximately $127,000) and apply it as an advance credit against the next Tax Free Distributive Payment he would have to make, on July 1, 2020. 62. Defendant rejected Plaintiff’s proposal. 63. Paragraph 16.1 of the Stipulation provides that the prevailing party in any action commenced to enforce the Stipulation shall be entitled to recover his or her attorneys’ fees. First Cause of Action (Declaratory Judgment) 64. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above as though fully set forth at length hereat. 65. By reason of the foregoing, Defendant has breached the Parties’ Stipulation by failing and refusing to disclaim any interest in the 2017 Federal and New York State income tax overpayment and by accepting, seeking or taking any credit or cash refund for half of that overpayment on her 2018 (or later) New York State and/or Federal tax returns. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 11 of 15 11 66. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to enforcement of the Stipulation and to insure that, a declaration of this Court that: (a) the approximately $127,000 credit or refund that Defendant has taken or received, or which she may take or receive from New York State is and shall be treated by the Parties as a credit against and reduces the balance of the Tax Free Distributive Payments to which Defendant is entitled under the Stipulation; and (b) any tax credit or tax refund Defendant shall seek and obtain from the IRS with respect to or arising out of the 2017 tax overpayments is and shall be treated by the Parties as a credit against and reduces the balance of the Tax Free Distributive Payments to which Defendant is entitled under the Stipulation. Second Cause of Action (Reformation) 67. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above as though fully set forth at length hereat. 68. If the Court declines to grant the Declaration sought in the First Cause of Action, then Plaintiff asks this Court to reform the Stipulation to provide, consistent with the Parties’ agreement that Defendant has no interest in and is not entitled to any portion of the 2017 tax overpayments shown on their 2017 joint tax returns, or the tax refunds or credits arising therefrom, and that the benefit of such tax overpayments and the resulting tax credits or refunds are entirely the property of Plaintiff. Third Cause of Action (Unjust Enrichment) 69. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above as though fully set forth at length hereat. 70. By reason of the foregoing, Defendant has been enriched at Plaintiff’s expense. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 12 of 15 12 71. It is against equity and good conscience to permit Defendant to retain the benefit of the estimated tax overpayments made by Plaintiff, overpayments that were made with respect to and solely out of the earnings and income generated by Plaintiff, a benefit she has unjustly obtained and retained from and at the expense of Plaintiff. 72. Defendant’s conduct was undertaken for her own personal benefit and with such wanton recklessness or dishonesty as to imply a criminal indifference to her obligations to Plaintiff under the Stipulation. 73. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant as follows: A. On the First Cause of Action, a declaration of this Court that: (1) the approximately $127,000 credit or refund that Defendant has taken or received, or which she may take or receive from New York State is and shall be treated by the Parties as a credit against and reduces the balance of the Tax Free Distributive Payments to which Defendant is entitled under the Stipulation; and (2) any tax credit or tax refund Defendant shall seek and obtain from the IRS with respect to or arising out of the 2017 tax overpayments is and shall be treated by the Parties as a credit against and reduces the balance of the Tax Free Distributive Payments to which Defendant is entitled under the Stipulation. B. Alternatively, on the Second Cause of Action, reformation of the Stipulation to provide that Defendant has no interest in and is not entitled to any portion of the 2017 tax overpayments shown on the Parties’ 2017 joint tax returns, or the tax FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 13 of 15 13 refunds or credits arising therefrom, and that the benefit of such tax overpayments and the resulting tax credits or refunds are entirely the property of Plaintiff; C. On the Third Cause of Action, compensatory damages in an amount as shall be proven at trial, together with interest and an award of punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial; and D. Such other and further relief as this Court shall deem just and proper and equitable, including but not limited to his prevailing party attorneys’ fees as provided in the Stipulation. Dated: September 11, 2020 New York, New York Advocate LLP By: ______________________ Eleanor Grosz, Esq. 805 Third Avenue, Suite 2030 New York, New York 10022 212.776.1926 Verification (by electronic video) FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020 14 of 15 VERIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) I am the Plaintiff in the within action. I have read the foregoing Complaint and know the contents thereof. The contents are true to my own knowledge except as to matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. TER MENSCH STATE OF NEW YORK ) : ss.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) On the 1I'h day of September in the year 2020, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared PETER MENSCH, by way of live video conference (namely: Facetime) which allowed for direct interaction between us in accordance with New York State Executive Order No. 202.7, issued March 19, 2020 and extended through October 4, 2020. PETER MENSCH is personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence displayed during the video conference to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within ins ent. He acknowledged to me that he was at that time physically present in the County of . State of New York, and executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the strument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. A legible copy of the signed instrument was transmitted directly to the undersigned by me IRL Meme of her picture describing her life in two sentences. Funny how the DOXED and EXPOZED failure of a mother is now living in a unfurnished studio in new york off a disability check after everything poor Louise been through. Clearly explains why she makes sock twitter account and pretends to DOCUMENT people. DONT miss this picture below it will make an amazing twitter header. Lmao irl meme: https://gyazo.com/597bdbea926fca00b9f65c6ed252b7dd /EndLog Patribotics Louise Mensch ================================================================================================ ================================================================================================ =================================================================================================== DAUGHTER Jona Mensch 25 DOB: 01/21/1996 SSN: 499-592-198 Bank info from chex-systm api dateOfBirth":"1996**","genderCode":"F","maritalstatus":null,"socialSecurityNumber":null,"firstName":"JONA","middleName":"FORD","lastName":"MENSCH","driversLicenseNumber":null,"state":null,"areaCode":"646","phoneNumber":"5595598" (646) 334-5623 Phone Number: 16463345623 Carrier: Cingular Wireless-NSR/2 Is Wireless: y SMS Gateway Address: 6463345623@txt.att.net MMS Gateway Address: 6463345623@mms.att.net AT&T Same as her dad Peter =` ) Related to Elijah Mensch, 27 • Hannah Mensch • Peter Mensch, 68 • Melissa Meyer, 55 • Louise Bagshawe, 50 Lived in Portland, OR Youtube Jona Mensch: Spanish Timeline Project Jona Mensch: spanish timeline project Duration: 2m 30s Uploaded: 19 Dec, 2012 Category: People & Blogs Mensch, Jona, Wo Bist Du? Mensch, Jona, wo bist du? Duration: 22s Uploaded: 13 Jul, 2009 Category: Music Der Kirchentag-Rap 2009 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXxb4leK5Gs 267 W 11th St New York, NY 10014 - Current 1482 Dekalb Ave #2R Brooklyn, NY 11237 (May 2020 - Aug 2020) - Previous boyfriend? lol https://gyazo.com/ebe5359d27f76ae22c135e6dbf2a5b35 (Pic from portland OR) /EndLog Daughter Joan Mensch ====================================================================== ====================================================================== =================================================================================================== Husband: Peter Mensch DOB: 03/28/1953 IRL: https://gyazo.com/bc1a74a71409b1c1f597061cc18e6bb3 // https://gyazo.com/8ff28a7c762e3a51ecfe3b84be461b78 off bank accnt reigstry: 2129299534 LAst 4 of DL: 9454 Email: peter.mensch@yahoo.com peter@qprime.com (212) 724-1986 (LL) (646) 559-5598 (212) 929-6525 116 W 80th St - Current New York, NY 10024 Bank info from chex-systm api dateOfBirth":"1953**","genderCode":"M","maritalstatus":null,"socialSecurityNumber":null,"firstName":"PETER","middleName":"D","lastName":"MENSCH","driversLicenseNumber":"*9454","state":"NY","areaCode":"212","phoneNumber":"9299534" Previous 4401 Us Highway 70 E New Bern, NC 28562 (Nov 2000 - Aug 2013) 561 Daniels Ln Sagaponack, NY 11962 (Sep 2000 - Feb 2012) 729 7th Ave #1600 New York, NY 10019 (Dec 2009 - Aug 2011) Other pub search results & address registry: Age 68 (March 1953) pe*********h@yahoo.com [Unknown marital status] (212) 929-6525 - Home/LandLine Phone (917) 821-1757 - Wireless 116 W 80th St New York, NY 10024-6351 Home address, vacation, business, rental and apartment property addresses for Peter 561 Daniels Ln, Sagaponack, NY 11962-2010 - reported in February 2012 (1 year) 729 7th Ave, STE 1600, New York, NY 10019-6880 - reported in August 2011 (1 year) 747 3rd Ave, New York, NY 10017-2803 - reported in January 2011 (1 year) 726 7th Ave, New York, NY 10019-6830 - reported in October 2010 (1 year) 1 Potato Rd, Sagaponack, NY 11962-2073 - reported in October 2010 (1 year) 278 W 4th St, New York, NY 10014-2468 - reported in June 1996 (1 year) 267 W 11th St, New York, NY 10014-2412 - reported in May 1996 (1 year) 22 W 21st St, New York, NY 10010-6904 - reported in December 2010 (1 year) 1421 Croes Ave, APT 2, Bronx, NY 10472-1430 - reported in August 2010 (1 year) 413 Domino Ln, Philadelphia, PA 19128-4303 - reported in July 2008 (1 year) Po Box 178, Sagaponack, NY 11962-0178 - reported in July 2008 (1 year) 25 Grace Ct, Brooklyn, NY 11201-4111 - reported in July 2001 (13 years) 4401 Us Highway 70 E, New Bern, NC 28562-7034 - reported in August 2013 (1 year) 15 E 26th St, STE 1803, New York, NY 10010-1404 - reported in March 1997 (1 year) 95 Horatio St, APT 7C, New York, NY 10014-1590 - reported in December 1996 (1 year) Po Box 3070, Hoboken, NJ 07030-1601 - reported in December 1993 (29 years) Home telephone number and mobile/wireless/cell phone numbers for Peter (212) 929-6525 - LandLine - October 2021 (212) 724-1986 - LandLine - August 2021 (212) 580-6597 - LandLine - August 2021 (646) 559-5598 - LandLine - June 2019 (718) 625-4687 - LandLine - June 2018 (212) 929-6716 - LandLine - January 2017 (917) 821-1757 - Wireless - December 2016 (212) 206-1169 - LandLine - March 2016 (631) 537-4986 - LandLine - March 2016 (212) 929-6526 - LandLine - June 2015 (212) 929-7297 - LandLine - December 2012 (212) 627-0000 - LandLine - April 2010 (212) 302-9790 - LandLine - December 2009 (212) 929-0000 - LandLine - October 2009 (917) 754-0951 - Wireless - January 2009 lo*********h@gmail.com pe*********h@yahoo.com pe**r@meyermensch.com pe**r@qprime.com pe***m@meyermensch.com pm****h@aol.com Article Mentions: https://www.redonline.co.uk/red-women/blogs/a514414/peter-mensch-reveals-reason-for-louise-mensch-new-york-move/ /EndLOg Husband Peter Mensch ================================================================================================ =================================================================================================== Mirrors: https://dumpz.org/cM7FzAgq7MFe https://doxbin.com/upload/PatriboticsWashedupAuthorFailure https://ghostbin.com/HWZGD https://www.toptal.com/developers/hastebin/kafixixare.sql https://skidbin.net/paste/rkykjxYZUQ //#CHecKMiZZaTe #SergeiOnTop #BWA2021 ~BWA~ "The House Always Wins"