Poor doxed Louise... after 3 husbands, 20 facelifts, and 2 str8 days if getting CyberBullied by hackers she STILL is DEFENSELESS and rage spamming her feed with autism all over twitter to her fake botted followers. A mother and failed politician ranting on and on about Russian spy's, Covid, politics, etc. She genuinely believes that her twitter rants do something to harm the RUssian economy or make the world a better place. This lady underwent crminal charges for stealing her former husbands Tax returns. (Court records below)  She now resides in a 1 bedroom studio apartment with nothing to show for her pathetic attempt of a life, sitting on her AT&T account which is still payed for by her husband Peter Mensch who she got indicted for TRYING to steal from. Louise is a complete failure below you will find proof of her ineptitude, her Social Security number, emails, addresses, articles of her political career which fell apart, and more. Please do enjoy the document and remember that "The House Always Wins."  Making up russian names and posting fake info on twitter on BWA members will do nothing. You're not built for the infosec career which you roleplay that you are good at Louise. Your political career is a FRAUD. Your hacking career is a FRAUD. Your pretending to "dox" people like IRDev looks cringe as fuck. You think he is indian when his lawsuit against the CIA is public.  How dumb can you possibly be lady? LOL Like GET REAL!!! Anyways to all who are reading enjoy the release. 






Proof of facelift be4 & after picks and BWA laughing at this reject; https://gyazo.com/d568bac3a35d1d638ce8c9588225b06d

Her fake doxing others earlier in May: https://archive.is/drobG


Deluded cumdump thinks she "doxxed" us  LMAO 

https://gyazo.com/e6301ce3262f7e7f3f70d0c9b93ab9ee

https://gyazo.com/d28447ef1e9146503aae58345f772a3b





Time 2 bring her back 2 reality a little bit with a couple L'z from the UnDoXeD Department 


@Patribotics another follower of louise Mensch
(Some ex parliament washed up author)
Who got her husband doxed and SPIT ON by BWA
Is now raging all over twitter and Fake Doxing people

Screenshots of the failure getting humiliated are below enjoy

=`}~~ 

#LeninGradOnTop 

https://gyazo.com/2e69795074263396e16f2f43dc76b6d7

https://gyazo.com/a63f110ccb23bf51abeba0c766d0d952


Retard pretend doxes Sa7an: https://gyazo.com/17915c8c573f2a3961b677f3fde0e493

https://gyazo.com/17915c8c573f2a3961b677f3fde0e493



This British poser just took the Biggest L on social media this MONTH LMFAO






=========================================================================================



Twitter handles:

@Patribotics  @Dear_Mr_Putin  @LouiseMesch 

@Dear_Mr_Putin  @Patribotics  @LouiseMnesch

Louise Mensch   (Louise D Bagshawe)

DOB: 06/28/1971

SSN: 616-08-5961
 

IRL: https://gyazo.com/3c355d2aefaf9e540bb5317f0be2e645  //  https://gyazo.com/a6dd250ec3cc0bfdfefea501ff9d1f9a


41 Bradhurst Ave
New York, NY 10030  -  Current



Phone Numbers
(917) 821-1757 - Wireless
(914) 961-3563 - Landline
(212) 580-6597 - Landline

louisemensch@gmail.com


Bank info from chex-systm api 

"dateOfBirth":"1971**","genderCode":"F","maritalstatus":null,"socialSecurityNumber":null,"firstName":"LOUISE","lastName":"MENSCH","driversLicenseNumber":null,"state":null,"areaCode":"212","phoneNumber":"5806597"



Other related / Old (Possibly on same phone plan)

(212) 929-6525 - Landline
(917) 623-2221 - Wireless
(212) 724-1986 - Landline
(914) 793-2092 - Landline
917 821 1757  (Old still works) 








Wiki Leaks
			
Fwd: Hillary ad
	
					From:mkives@caa.com
					To: ha16@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, re47@hillaryclinton.com
					Date: 2016-02-14 16:29
					Subject: Fwd: Hillary ad
					
				


			

				

					I like this idea

(Louise is a former Conservative British MP. Very smart.)

Begin forwarded message:

From: Louise Mensch <louisemensch@gmail.com<mailto:louisemensch@gmail.com>>
Date: February 14, 2016 at 11:25:16 AM MST
To: Michael Kives <MKives@caa.com<mailto:MKives@caa.com>>
Cc: Peter Mensch <peter@qprime.com<mailto:peter@qprime.com>>
Subject: Hillary ad

Dear Michael,

As you will know from Arnold I am a committed Republican (or would be if I had the vote this year). But I worry no end about Donald Trump becoming our President... much rather have your girl Hillary.

Anyway, the politician in me thinks Lena Dunham and Gloria Steinem are nails on a chalkboard to the average American woman AND I think Hillary is not capitalizing on the yearning that we have to see a woman as President properly.

Her competence and intelligence are beyond doubt, her problem is warmth.

If I may, here is an ad I would love to see run;

OUR TIME

A succession of mostly young women, a few old women, one with a baby daughter, multiracial and multi-occupation, to include a nurse and a woman in uniform of some kind where permitted...

one after the other, smiling and looking to camera and saying 'It's our time.'

and the last woman says, 'It's our time. I'm with her.'

fade to banner credit 'Hillary 2016'

----

That would be inspirational, aspirational, and the kind of riff you really need on 'Yes we can'.

Best, Louise

--
Louise Mensch
+1 917 821 1757<tel:%2B1%20917%20821%201757>

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
				



She made her name as a bestselling writer, before becoming a Conservative MP last year, so how is Louise Bagshawe adjusting to her new life?

Louise Bagshawe is a single mum. She is a novelist who has sold about two million books. She also represents more than 90,000 people as a Member of Parliament.

In one of those career-defining statements which can sometimes come back to haunt people, Ms Bagshawe once said: "Of course women can have it all, if they want it all. I won't hear any defeatist talk."

There would hardly be any time for it, even if she wanted to complain.

Snacking on a muffin in the atrium of Portcullis House, where Westminster politicians go to gossip and socialise, she seems driven by adrenalin, having been elected the Conservative MP for Corby, in Northamptonshire, at last year's general election.

"It's unbelievably hectic," she said. "Having previously been a writer, where my office was my bedroom, it's very different. It's been a long time since I had a real job, and that was working in the record business for five minutes.






>>> AFFAIR <<< 

A British politician has been accused of having a 20-year extramarital affair with an American rock band manager who she went on to marry.

The family of Melissa Meyer have accused ex-Conservative MP Louise Mensch - née Bagshawe - of having an illicit relationship with Peter Mensch while he was still married to American Melissa.

Ms Meyer's family have voiced suspicions that the couple had a 20-year affair when they were both married – Peter to Melissa, and Louise to U.S. businessman Anthony LoCicero.   

The two women now live in close proximity in Manhattan after Louise, 41, dramatically announced she was resigning her parliamentary seat in England and moved into a mansion on the Upper West Side with Peter.

Melissa, a 44-year-old former school teacher, remains in the $7million Greenwich Village townhouse she once shared with her husband. 

The likelihood of the two women peacefully coexisting seems especially remote after the startling claim by the family of Melissa, known as Missy, that Peter and Louise were long embroiled in an adulterous affair. 



Pic: https://gyazo.com/314d20cb0cde8324bc8befc7b17c9261

=============

Work related job desc & info pulled off work registries:

Webcam Consumer Interviews
Title Webcam Consumer Interviews

CITRIN COOPERMAN

OXONIAN SOCIETY, INC.

THE OXONIAN SOCIETY

ST. MARTIN'S PRESS

ZEMANTA

APOLLO_IO_129M_MARKETING_2018 
Email    lmensch@newscorp.com
Name    Louise Mensch
City    New York
Country    United States
Linkedin    http://www.linkedin.com/in/louisemensch
Job    Creative & Strategic
Company    Newscorp
Phone    +12124163400
City    New York
Country    United States
Postal    10036
Job    Vice President, Creative and Strategy, News Corporation
Company    The News Corporation Limited
Phone    +12128527000
City    New York
Country    United States
Postal    10036
Job    Vice President, Creative and Strategy, News Corporation
Company    News Corp

DRIZLY_COM_2M_SHOPPING_072020 Not Found
Email    bagshawe@me.com
Lastip    107.77.224.132
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Hash    $2a$10$dorJ8ntJtIMXafb240vIpeNLfzwPravKgYL8baqVEG8jP7Lf1Jp4y
Salt    $2a$10$dorJ8ntJtIMXafb240vIpe
Password    c0904fcad0cf24d38bc65156d5b49ca3
Name    Louise Mensch

123RF_COM_8M_PHOTOS_032020 Not Found
Email    louisemensch@GMAIL.COM
Lastip    216.220.98.51
Hash    dc7f4178ed8db0a66441433fa05d65df
Name    Louise Mensch
Phone    9178211757
Company    Forma Flos Inc
Street1    116 West 80
City    New York
State    NY
Country    GB
Postcode    10024
Newsletter    N
Payby    paypal
Paypal_email    louisemensch@gmail.com
Paymentlimit    50.00
Approved    Y
Date_register    2016-09-16T22:00:00.000Z
Agreement    Y
Allowextended    Y
Mini_lb    1
Ip_country    US

DRIZLY_COM_2M_SHOPPING_072020 Not Found
Email    louisemensch@gmail.com
Lastip    98.15.86.224
New York, New York, United States
Hash    $2a$10$lilfL7MDtpBBgGDuZG2VpeGZtAidwigFVihqVf6vgn2ilPaurvxym
Salt    $2a$10$lilfL7MDtpBBgGDuZG2Vpe
Name    Louise Mensch



=============

























Below is rthe court documents on when our mentally inatiquate friend (@Patribotics) aka Louise Mensch ATTEMPED TO STEAL her former husbands tax refund check for $800,000. Being the failure that she is she got caught and subpoenaed to court. The court records are here below. Enjoy the hilarity. 



Court records when she stole Peters Tax Refund


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK COUNTY
-------------------------------------------------------x 
PETER MENSCH, S U M M O N S
Plaintiff, Index No.:
-againstPLACE OF TRIAL
LOUISE MENSCH, New York County
BASIS OF VENUE: 
Defendants. Plaintiff’s Residence
-------------------------------------------------------x 
To the Above Named Defendant:
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Verified Complaint in this action
and to serve a copy of your answer, on the plaintiff’s attorneys within 20 days after the service of 
this summons, exclusive of the day of service (or within 30 days after the service is complete if 
this summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case of 
your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief 
demanded in the complaint. 
Dated: September 11, 2020 ADVOCATE, LLP
By: 
Eleanor Grosz, Esq. 
805 Third Avenue, Suite 2030
New York, New York 10022
(212) 776-1926
Attorneys for Plaintiff
To: David Zaslavsky, Esq. 
Attorneys for Defendant
11 Broadway, Suite 450
New York, New York 10004
(212) 390-0076
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
1 of 15
1 
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK COUNTY
--------------------------------------------------------x 
PETER MENSCH, Index No.
Plaintiff, VERIFIED COMPLAINT
-againstLOUISE MENSCH,
Defendant.
------------------------------------------------------x 
Plaintiff Peter Mensch, by his attorneys, Advocate, LLP, as and for his Complaint against 
Defendant Louise Mensch, alleges the following:
Nature of this Action
1. This is an action to reform the Stipulation of Settlement dated July 19, 2019, and
Judgment of Divorce entered on August 28, 2019, between the Parties. In that Stipulation, 
Plaintiff agreed to pay and Defendant agreed to accept a total of $3.8 million in full and final 
satisfaction of all her claims for equitable distribution, and Defendant waived any and all interest 
in all other property including Plaintiff’s income tax overpayments and refunds. However, when 
Plaintiff filed his 2018 US and New York State income tax returns, after the Parties had entered 
into that Stipulation, the New York State Tax Authority declined to allow him to receive the full 
credit for the 2017 income tax overpayment that was due on his income as shown on his 2017 
return, and instead allocated half of that refund to Defendant. Although she was not and is not 
entitled to receive or retain that refund, Defendant has opportunistically asserted that the refund is 
hers and that she is entitled to hold it in addition to the $3.8 million Plaintiff agreed to pay. 
Because that was decidedly not the agreement the Parties – and their lawyers – made, Plaintiff 
seeks a declaration enforcing the Stipulation or, alternatively, reformation on the grounds of 
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
2 of 15
2 
mutual mistake, a scrivener’s error: their lawyers inadvertently neglected to include in the 
Stipulation a helpful but not required standard boilerplate provision that Defendant had no interest 
in and was not entitled to any portion of the income tax overpayment they knew would be due to 
Plaintiff as the result of his historic overpayment of estimated taxes. Based on the 2017 income 
tax return they filed jointly (their last joint return), Plaintiff’s overpayment was in excess of 
$800,000, and his overpayment on the New York State Return was more than $250,000 – half of 
which Defendant has wrongfully, improperly and unjustly applied (of will seek to have applied) to 
her own benefit, despite the Parties’ knowledge and agreement and the provisions of the 
Stipulation. 
Parties
2. Plaintiff resides in the City and State of New York.
3. Defendant resides in the City and State of New York.
Background Facts
4. The Parties were married in 2011.
5. Plaintiff commenced an action for divorce in Supreme Court, New York County:
Mensch v. Mensch, Index No. 309381/2017 in September 2017. 
6. On July 19, 2019, the Parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement
(“Stipulation”), and a Judgment of Divorce, which incorporated but did not merge the Stipulation, 
was entered on August 28, 2019 (A copy of the Stipulation is annexed as Exhibit A.)
7. The Parties were represented by experienced counsel in the divorce action and in
connection with the Stipulation. Plaintiff was represented by Eleanor Grosz, Esq., and Defendant 
was represented by Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich, LLP. 
8. In the Stipulation, Plaintiff agreed to pay, and Defendant agreed to accept a Tax
Free Distributive Award of $3.8 million. 
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
3 of 15
3 
9. As the result of (i) the New York State Tax Authority’s error in failing to allocate 
the full 2017 New York State overpayment to Plaintiff’s 2018 income tax obligation, (ii) 
Defendant’s effort to take advantage of that error knowing full well that her financial rights were 
limited to a $ 3.8 million settlement; and (iii) the inadvertent failure by counsel for both parties to 
include in the Stipulation, what would have been a helpful but not required, boilerplate provision
in the Stipulation making it clear that Defendant had no right to receive the benefit of any tax 
overpayments; the Stipulation should be enforced so as to limit the financial benefit to Defendant 
to the $ 3.8 million she bargained for or, in the alternative, to reform the Stipulation to specifically 
address that each party is entitled to the overpayment, if any, solely attributable to his or her 
income. 
Plaintiff’s Historic Practice of Overpaying his Estimated Taxes
10. Plaintiff’s business is to manage musicians and other artists. He earns a significant 
income, which can vary substantially from year to year.
11. Historically, Plaintiff has followed his accountant’s advice and routinely, overpays 
his estimated taxes with the consequence that he invariably is entitled to a substantial tax refund
or credit to his following year’s obligation. Also consistent with his accountant’s advice, Plaintiff 
elects to apply his overpayments against the estimated taxes due on his following year’s income 
tax return. 
12. Plaintiff employed this practice on both his Federal and New York State tax 
returns. 
13. Plaintiff did the same with respect to the 2017 tax year, the year in which he filed 
the divorce action.
14. Defendant was not employed in 2017 and had modest income that year.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
4 of 15
4 
15. Defendant was at all times aware that Plaintiff intentionally overpaid his estimated 
taxes, and she acknowledged and agreed that he – and not she – would not be entitled to any 
portion of that overpayment. 
16. The Parties filed joint returns for 2017, the year the divorce action was 
commenced.
17. Plaintiff filed his income tax returns for 2018 after the Stipulation was signed in 
July 2019, and the Judgment of Divorce was entered in August 2019. 
18. Upon information and belief, as of the date of this complaint, Defendant has not 
yet filed her 2018 income tax returns.
19. Although the Stipulation addressed the Parties’ respective obligations to pay his her 
income taxes, interest and penalties as related to each of his/her own income and the Parties’ 
respective obligations for deficiency assessments, penalties and interest flowing from his her 
income, the Stipulation did not specifically include language providing that each of the Parties 
would be given credit for their respective overpayments, if any, resulting from his/her income. 
20. The omission of this language was an inadvertent mistake: it was a scrivener’s 
error, and it fails to capture the agreement of the Parties.
21. The Stipulation incontrovertibly provides that Defendant was entitled to, and would 
be paid $3.8 million in equitable distribution – no more, and no less. 
The Stipulation 
22. In exchange for, among other things, waiving claims to any appreciation in the 
value of Plaintiff’s various separate and marital property, Plaintiff agreed to pay Defendant $3.8 
million as a tax free distributive award (“Tax Free Distributive Payments”).
23. The Tax Free Distributive Payments were to be made as follows:
a. $1,000,000 on July 19, 2019 (upon signing the Stipulation);
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
5 of 15
5 
b. $1,800,000 on or about August 2, 2019 (when Defendant vacated their 
former marital residence);
c. $400,000 of the remaining $1 million on or before July 1, 2020 (the “First 
Anniversary Payment” in the Stipulation); 
d. $300,000 on the second anniversary of Defendant’s vacating the former 
marital residence (“Second Anniversary Payment”); and the final 
e. $300,000 on the third anniversary of Defendant vacating our former marital
residence (“Third Anniversary Payment”).
24. In Paragraph 3.10 of the Stipulation, Defendant expressly waived any further 
equitable distribution in excess of, or other than, the Tax Free Distributive Payments. 
Specifically, the Stipulation provides: 
Except as specifically set forth in this Agreement, the parties waive any further
division or distribution of marital or separate property .... It is the parties’ intent 
that this provision shall, in conjunction with the remaining provisions of this 
Agreement, be determinative, definitive and in final disposition and in 
satisfaction of any and all ownership claims or equitable or legal rights that 
either may have in and to any property, separate or marital, of the other.
[Emphasis added.]
25. Similarly, Paragraph 13.5 of the Stipulation provides that: 
This Agreement is entire and complete and embodies all of the understandings 
and agreements of the parties and supersedes any and all prior understandings and 
agreements between them. [Emphasis added.]
26. Article IX of the Stipulation addressed the Parties’ income taxes. The Parties’ 
acknowledged that they filed joint income tax returns through year 2017. The Parties’ each 
represented that they were unaware of any outstanding or unpaid taxes, penalties or interest 
relating to their joint returns. (Stipulation, ¶9.1, p. 30).
27. But, unfortunately and mistakenly, the Stipulation did not expressly state – what 
the Parties had nevertheless agreed – that Defendant was not and would not be entitled to any 
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
6 of 15
6 
other financial benefit including overpayments or refunds attributable to his income or related to 
any of their joint returns.
28. Defendant agreed to this because, among other things, the annual income and 
earnings of the Parties was vastly disproportionate and substantially all (if not all) of the 
estimated tax overpayment was attributable to Plaintiff and his historic practice of overpaying 
his estimated taxes.
29. In addition, Plaintiff agreed to pay and to indemnify Defendant from and against 
any deficiency assessments, including penalties and interest for any joint returns they had filed to 
the extent that it was a result of (a) his failure to disclose income that should have been included 
in the joint return, (b) disallowance of deductions attributable solely to his income, and (c) any 
business in which he was/is the majority owner. 
30. Similarly, Defendant provided Plaintiff with a reciprocal indemnity and hold 
harmless. 
31. The Parties also expressly agreed that they would file separate income tax returns 
“for the year 2018 and each successive year.” (Stipulation, ¶9.1, p. 30) 
The 2017 Income Tax Returns 
32. On or about April 11, 2018, the Parties each signed IRS Form 8878 authorizing 
their then-accountants, Citrin Cooperman, to file for an extension of time to file their 2017 tax 
returns.
33. On or about October 12, 2018, the Parties each authorized Citrin Cooperman to 
electronically file their 2017 joint returns, which contained the overpayments at issues, and 
which returns were in fact filed that month.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
7 of 15
7 
34. Citrin Cooperman determined that Plaintiff had overpaid his 2017 federal income 
taxes by $816,102 and Defendant had underpaid her federal income taxes by $10,413. 
35. The Parties, thus, had an overpayment of $805,689 on their 2017 Federal tax 
return – 100% of which was attributable to Plaintiff’s earnings. 
36. In filing his 2018 federal income tax return Plaintiff duly elected to apply his 
entire federal overpayment to his 2018 federal income tax obligation. 
37. Similarly, the 2017 NYS return showed an overpaid the taxes due to New York 
State for 2017 by the amount of $255,480. 
38. Citrin Cooperman specifically determined that for 2017, Plaintiff had over paid 
his State taxes by $246,478 and Defendant had over paid her state by $9,002. 
39. As he had done with respect to his Federal taxes, Plaintiff elected to apply the 
entire overpayment of $255,480 to his 2018 New York State income tax obligation. 
40. Defendant was at all times aware of these determinations by Citrin Cooperman 
and of the notices and elections made by Plaintiff for tax year 2017.
41. Plaintiff’s practice – overpaying his estimated taxes, applying the overpayment to 
future tax liabilities and not taking a cash refund from the taxing authority (State or Federal) – 
was long-standing and well known to Defendant. 
42. Citrin Cooperman, the Parties’ accountants, were his accountants before the 
Parties married and they have been his accountants for decades. Citrin Cooperman has 
consistently taken this conservative approach to preparing Plaintiff’s – and the Parties’ – tax 
returns in order to ensure that Plaintiff (and the Parties during the marriage) did not incur any 
penalties, particularly since Plaintiff received income from several companies, for which 
Schedule K-1s frequently were not issued until well after April 15. 
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
8 of 15
8 
43. For example, in 2016, Plaintiff had an overpayment of $1,151,977 to the IRS, 
which he applied to his 2017 taxes. Plaintiff applied his overpayment of $410,067 on his State 
taxes towards his 2017 State tax obligation. 
44. Following changes in the tax law at the end of 2017, Citrin Cooperman advised 
Plaintiff to take an even more conservative approach regarding payment of estimated taxes in 
2017. 
45. On April 15, 2018, when Plaintiff filed for an extension to file his 2017 returns, he 
paid an additional $350,000 in estimated taxes to the IRS and over $400,000 to New York State
– even though he already had an overpayment of more than $1.1 million that was being applied 
from the 2016 return towards his 2017 estimated taxes. 
Defendant is not Entitled to Claim Plaintiff’s 2017 Overpayments on her 2018 Returns 
46. Defendant was at all times fully aware of Plaintiff’s 2017 income (which 
exceeded his 2016 income) and his significant overpayment of taxes due for 2017. 
47. During the negotiations that led to the Stipulation, Plaintiff’s 2017 income was 
fully disclosed, as was his practice of overpaying his estimated taxes and applying the
overpayment to future tax liabilities.
48. The Parties had contemplated filing a joint return for 2017, but they ultimately 
filed separate tax returns for 2017 when Defendant refused to provide documentation Plaintiff 
and his accountants with information regarding her income, expenses, and deductions to the 
accountants. 
49. Plaintiff filed his 2017 tax returns under the status: “married filing separately.” 
50. Plaintiff applied the federal overpayment of $805,689 towards his 2018 federal tax 
liability, and he applied the $255,480 overpayment towards his 2018 State tax liability. 
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
9 of 15
9 
51. Plaintiff’s tax filings were proper and consistent with the Parties’ agreement as 
was (or should have been) provided in the Stipulation.
52. After he filed his tax returns for 2017, he received notices from the IRS and New 
York State.
53. The IRS accepted his return and applied the entire $805,689 overpayment towards 
his 2018 tax obligations.
54. New York State, however, advised Plaintiff, without any foundation in fact or law, 
that it would only allow Plaintiff a credit of $127,740 (only 50% of the $255,480 overpayment) 
towards his 2018 NYS tax obligation. 
55. Upon information and belief, this means that New York is applying or intends to 
apply the other half of Plaintiff’s overpayment ($127,740) as a credit on Defendant’s 2018 tax 
returns. 
56. Upon information and belief, because Defendant over paid her New York State 
income taxes by only $9,002 in 2017, by claiming or taking credit for the $127,740 that Plaintiff 
had overpaid his anticipated tax liability, Defendant will receive a windfall refund or credit on 
her New York State tax return of more than $120,000.
57. Because Defendant had under paid her 2017 Federal income taxes by more than 
$10,000, the entire $828,605 overpayment on the Parties’ 2017 (their last) joint Federal tax 
return was entirely attributable to – and was allowed by the IRS – to Plaintiff. 
58. Upon information and belief, however, if Defendant were to file and seek to claim 
50% of Plaintiff’s Federal overpayment, or if she were to challenge the IRS’s determination that 
Plaintiff is entitled to the entire overpayment, Defendant would seek, and she might receive, 
another windfall credit or refund of potentially $400,000 or more. 
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
10 of 15
10 
59. When Plaintiff learned that New York State would not apply all of the 2017 
overpayment to his tax obligations and his 2018 tax return, he contacted Defendant in an effort 
to correct the mistake and make an appropriate adjustment consistent with their agreement.
60. Plaintiff offered to Pay Defendant $9,002 (the amount of her own 2017 
overpayment), and to waive any claim for reimbursement of the $10,413 by which she had 
underpaid her 2017 Federal taxes; and he asked Defendant to file her 2018 income tax returns 
consistent with the agreement reached as to the division of marital and separate assets and 
liabilities, i.e., an agreement not to file any tax returns claiming any portion of the 2017 
overpayment on her 2018 tax returns. 
61. In exchange, Plaintiff proposed that Defendant could retain the anticipated refund 
from New York State (approximately $127,000) and apply it as an advance credit against the
next Tax Free Distributive Payment he would have to make, on July 1, 2020. 
62. Defendant rejected Plaintiff’s proposal. 
63. Paragraph 16.1 of the Stipulation provides that the prevailing party in any action 
commenced to enforce the Stipulation shall be entitled to recover his or her attorneys’ fees.
First Cause of Action
(Declaratory Judgment)
64. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above as though 
fully set forth at length hereat.
65. By reason of the foregoing, Defendant has breached the Parties’ Stipulation by 
failing and refusing to disclaim any interest in the 2017 Federal and New York State income tax 
overpayment and by accepting, seeking or taking any credit or cash refund for half of that 
overpayment on her 2018 (or later) New York State and/or Federal tax returns.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
11 of 15
11 
66. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to enforcement of the Stipulation 
and to insure that, a declaration of this Court that: 
(a) the approximately $127,000 credit or refund that Defendant has taken or 
received, or which she may take or receive from New York State is and shall be treated by the 
Parties as a credit against and reduces the balance of the Tax Free Distributive Payments to 
which Defendant is entitled under the Stipulation; and
(b) any tax credit or tax refund Defendant shall seek and obtain from the IRS 
with respect to or arising out of the 2017 tax overpayments is and shall be treated by the Parties 
as a credit against and reduces the balance of the Tax Free Distributive Payments to which 
Defendant is entitled under the Stipulation. 
Second Cause of Action
(Reformation)
67. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above as though 
fully set forth at length hereat.
68. If the Court declines to grant the Declaration sought in the First Cause of Action, 
then Plaintiff asks this Court to reform the Stipulation to provide, consistent with the Parties’ 
agreement that Defendant has no interest in and is not entitled to any portion of the 2017 tax 
overpayments shown on their 2017 joint tax returns, or the tax refunds or credits arising 
therefrom, and that the benefit of such tax overpayments and the resulting tax credits or refunds 
are entirely the property of Plaintiff.
Third Cause of Action
(Unjust Enrichment)
69. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above as though 
fully set forth at length hereat.
70. By reason of the foregoing, Defendant has been enriched at Plaintiff’s expense.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
12 of 15
12 
71. It is against equity and good conscience to permit Defendant to retain the benefit
of the estimated tax overpayments made by Plaintiff, overpayments that were made with respect 
to and solely out of the earnings and income generated by Plaintiff, a benefit she has unjustly 
obtained and retained from and at the expense of Plaintiff.
72. Defendant’s conduct was undertaken for her own personal benefit and with such
wanton recklessness or dishonesty as to imply a criminal indifference to her obligations to 
Plaintiff under the Stipulation.
73. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages in
an amount to be determined at trial.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant as follows:
A. On the First Cause of Action, a declaration of this Court that:
(1) the approximately $127,000 credit or refund that Defendant has taken or
received, or which she may take or receive from New York State is and shall be 
treated by the Parties as a credit against and reduces the balance of the Tax Free 
Distributive Payments to which Defendant is entitled under the Stipulation; and
(2) any tax credit or tax refund Defendant shall seek and obtain from the IRS
with respect to or arising out of the 2017 tax overpayments is and shall be treated 
by the Parties as a credit against and reduces the balance of the Tax Free 
Distributive Payments to which Defendant is entitled under the Stipulation.
B. Alternatively, on the Second Cause of Action, reformation of the Stipulation to
provide that Defendant has no interest in and is not entitled to any portion of the
2017 tax overpayments shown on the Parties’ 2017 joint tax returns, or the tax
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
13 of 15
13 
refunds or credits arising therefrom, and that the benefit of such tax overpayments 
and the resulting tax credits or refunds are entirely the property of Plaintiff; 
C. On the Third Cause of Action, compensatory damages in an amount as shall be
proven at trial, together with interest and an award of punitive damages in an
amount to be determined at trial; and
D. Such other and further relief as this Court shall deem just and proper and
equitable, including but not limited to his prevailing party attorneys’ fees as
provided in the Stipulation.
Dated: September 11, 2020 
New York, New York
Advocate LLP
By: ______________________
Eleanor Grosz, Esq.
805 Third Avenue, Suite 2030 
New York, New York 10022
212.776.1926 
Verification (by electronic video) 
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/2020 03:43 PM INDEX NO. 157356/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2020
14 of 15
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
I am the Plaintiff in the within action. I have read the foregoing Complaint and know the
contents thereof. The contents are true to my own knowledge except as to matters therein stated
to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
TER MENSCH
STATE OF NEW YORK )
: ss.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
On the 1I'h day of September in the year 2020, before me, the undersigned, personally
appeared PETER MENSCH, by way of live video conference (namely: Facetime) which allowed
for direct interaction between us in accordance with New York State Executive Order No. 202.7,
issued March 19, 2020 and extended through October 4, 2020. PETER MENSCH is personally
known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence displayed during the video
conference to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within ins ent. He
acknowledged to me that he was at that time physically present in the County of . State
of New York, and executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the strument,
the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument.
A legible copy of the signed instrument was transmitted directly to the undersigned by me





IRL Meme of her picture describing her life in two sentences. Funny how the DOXED and EXPOZED failure of a mother is now living in a unfurnished studio in new york off a disability check after everything poor Louise been through. Clearly explains why she makes sock twitter account and pretends to DOCUMENT people. DONT miss this picture below it will make an amazing twitter header. Lmao 


irl meme:   https://gyazo.com/597bdbea926fca00b9f65c6ed252b7dd





/EndLog Patribotics Louise Mensch

================================================================================================
================================================================================================


















===================================================================================================

DAUGHTER 


Jona Mensch 

25  

DOB:  01/21/1996

SSN: 499-592-198


Bank info from chex-systm api 

dateOfBirth":"1996**","genderCode":"F","maritalstatus":null,"socialSecurityNumber":null,"firstName":"JONA","middleName":"FORD","lastName":"MENSCH","driversLicenseNumber":null,"state":null,"areaCode":"646","phoneNumber":"5595598"








(646) 334-5623  

 Phone Number:

16463345623
Carrier:

Cingular Wireless-NSR/2
Is Wireless:

y
SMS Gateway Address:

6463345623@txt.att.net
MMS Gateway Address:

6463345623@mms.att.net



AT&T Same as her dad Peter    =` )




Related to

Elijah Mensch, 27 • Hannah Mensch • Peter Mensch, 68 • Melissa Meyer, 55 • Louise Bagshawe, 50

Lived in

Portland, OR


Youtube

Jona Mensch: Spanish Timeline Project
Jona Mensch: spanish timeline project
Duration:
2m 30s
Uploaded:
19 Dec, 2012
Category:
People & Blogs

Mensch, Jona, Wo Bist Du?
Mensch, Jona, wo bist du?
Duration:
22s
Uploaded:
13 Jul, 2009
Category:
Music
Der Kirchentag-Rap 2009

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXxb4leK5Gs



267 W 11th St
New York, NY 10014   - Current



1482 Dekalb Ave #2R
Brooklyn, NY 11237
(May 2020 - Aug 2020)   - Previous


boyfriend? lol   https://gyazo.com/ebe5359d27f76ae22c135e6dbf2a5b35  (Pic from portland OR)

/EndLog Daughter Joan Mensch

======================================================================
======================================================================


















===================================================================================================

Husband:  



Peter Mensch 

DOB: 03/28/1953


IRL: https://gyazo.com/bc1a74a71409b1c1f597061cc18e6bb3  //  https://gyazo.com/8ff28a7c762e3a51ecfe3b84be461b78



off bank accnt reigstry:  2129299534

LAst 4 of DL: 9454



Email: 

peter.mensch@yahoo.com 

peter@qprime.com


(212) 724-1986 (LL)
(646) 559-5598 
(212) 929-6525 



116 W 80th St      -	Current
New York, NY 10024




Bank info from chex-systm api 


dateOfBirth":"1953**","genderCode":"M","maritalstatus":null,"socialSecurityNumber":null,"firstName":"PETER","middleName":"D","lastName":"MENSCH","driversLicenseNumber":"*9454","state":"NY","areaCode":"212","phoneNumber":"9299534"



Previous 

4401 Us Highway 70 E
New Bern, NC 28562
(Nov 2000 - Aug 2013)
561 Daniels Ln
Sagaponack, NY 11962
(Sep 2000 - Feb 2012)
729 7th Ave #1600
New York, NY 10019
(Dec 2009 - Aug 2011) 



Other pub search results & address registry:

Age 68 (March 1953)

pe*********h@yahoo.com

[Unknown marital status]

(212) 929-6525 - Home/LandLine Phone

(917) 821-1757 - Wireless

116 W 80th St
New York, NY 10024-6351 

Home address, vacation, business, rental and apartment property addresses for Peter

    561 Daniels Ln, Sagaponack, NY 11962-2010
    - reported in February 2012 (1 year)
    729 7th Ave, STE 1600, New York, NY 10019-6880
    - reported in August 2011 (1 year)
    747 3rd Ave, New York, NY 10017-2803
    - reported in January 2011 (1 year)
    726 7th Ave, New York, NY 10019-6830
    - reported in October 2010 (1 year)
    1 Potato Rd, Sagaponack, NY 11962-2073
    - reported in October 2010 (1 year)
    278 W 4th St, New York, NY 10014-2468
    - reported in June 1996 (1 year)
    267 W 11th St, New York, NY 10014-2412
    - reported in May 1996 (1 year)
    22 W 21st St, New York, NY 10010-6904
    - reported in December 2010 (1 year)
    1421 Croes Ave, APT 2, Bronx, NY 10472-1430
    - reported in August 2010 (1 year)
    413 Domino Ln, Philadelphia, PA 19128-4303
    - reported in July 2008 (1 year)
    Po Box 178, Sagaponack, NY 11962-0178
    - reported in July 2008 (1 year)
    25 Grace Ct, Brooklyn, NY 11201-4111
    - reported in July 2001 (13 years)
    4401 Us Highway 70 E, New Bern, NC 28562-7034
    - reported in August 2013 (1 year)
    15 E 26th St, STE 1803, New York, NY 10010-1404
    - reported in March 1997 (1 year)
    95 Horatio St, APT 7C, New York, NY 10014-1590
    - reported in December 1996 (1 year)
    Po Box 3070, Hoboken, NJ 07030-1601
    - reported in December 1993 (29 years)


Home telephone number and mobile/wireless/cell phone numbers for Peter

    (212) 929-6525 - LandLine - October 2021
    (212) 724-1986 - LandLine - August 2021
    (212) 580-6597 - LandLine - August 2021
    (646) 559-5598 - LandLine - June 2019
    (718) 625-4687 - LandLine - June 2018
    (212) 929-6716 - LandLine - January 2017
    (917) 821-1757 - Wireless - December 2016
    (212) 206-1169 - LandLine - March 2016
    (631) 537-4986 - LandLine - March 2016
    (212) 929-6526 - LandLine - June 2015
    (212) 929-7297 - LandLine - December 2012
    (212) 627-0000 - LandLine - April 2010
    (212) 302-9790 - LandLine - December 2009
    (212) 929-0000 - LandLine - October 2009
    (917) 754-0951 - Wireless - January 2009



    lo*********h@gmail.com
    pe*********h@yahoo.com
    pe**r@meyermensch.com
    pe**r@qprime.com
    pe***m@meyermensch.com
    pm****h@aol.com




Article Mentions:

https://www.redonline.co.uk/red-women/blogs/a514414/peter-mensch-reveals-reason-for-louise-mensch-new-york-move/



/EndLOg Husband Peter Mensch

================================================================================================


















===================================================================================================







Mirrors: 

https://dumpz.org/cM7FzAgq7MFe

https://doxbin.com/upload/PatriboticsWashedupAuthorFailure

https://ghostbin.com/HWZGD

https://www.toptal.com/developers/hastebin/kafixixare.sql

https://skidbin.net/paste/rkykjxYZUQ




//#CHecKMiZZaTe #SergeiOnTop #BWA2021




	~BWA~

"The House Always Wins"